Apocalypse is a short story I wrote for the Writing in Practice class at university. (Go check it out, it's quite a bit less lousy than my attempts at art. No really!)
Anyway, so after writing the story I took upon myself the grand project of illustrating it, just to see if I could. I couldn't, of course. Here is the first panel I drew:

I'm unhappy with his hand, which looks too feminine, and I'm quite sure the shadows are all at the wrong places, but is it worse than that?
---
Anyway, on to the second panel, which is supposed to be a long shot from the other end of the bar. The purpose is to make the people in the bar obscure individually, but present nevertheless. I couldn't decide if I should give the background a wash first and then colour in the people (panel on top), or if I should colour in the people first and give everything a very watered-down wash eventually (panel on bottom). Look and them and tell me which one works?
Oh, ignore the appalling line art. As you can see, the two panels (which are supposed to be two ways of colouring the same panel) don't even have people or furniture at approximately the same places. Neither of these was supposed to be the final panel, and I'm an impatient woman, so I just sketched in some shapes directly with ink so that I could experiment with the colour. What I'm asking you is: which colouring looks better, or can you actually tell the difference?